Search

The social model of disability

6 min read · BoK 1A· p. 5–6

Learning objectives (3)
  • Contrast the social model with the medical model
  • Identify attitudinal and environmental barriers that create disability
  • Explain at least one strength and one limitation of the social model

Shifting the lens

The medical model asks: “What is wrong with this person, and how can it be fixed?” The social model asks an entirely different question: “What is wrong with the environment, and how can it be redesigned?” That shift — from individual deficit to collective responsibility — is the core insight the social model contributes. (BoK p. 5)

The social model’s core argument

Developed primarily by disabled activists in the United Kingdom during the 1970s and 1980s, the social model distinguishes sharply between impairment (a difference in body structure or function) and disability (the disadvantage imposed by an inaccessible society). Under this framework, a wheelchair user is not disabled by their inability to walk; they are disabled by stairs. (BoK p. 5)

The logical consequence is that disability can be substantially reduced — not by treating the person — but by removing barriers:

  • Environmental barriers: steps instead of ramps, websites without captions, documents in inaccessible formats.
  • Attitudinal barriers: assumptions that a person with a disability cannot perform a role, or that accessibility is a special favor rather than a right. (BoK p. 5)

The human rights dimension

The social model connects naturally to a human rights framework. If barriers are the source of disability, then people with impairments have a right to barrier-free participation in education, employment, and public life. This argument underpins major legal instruments, including the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). (BoK p. 6)

Strengths of the social model

  • It focuses responsibility on society and institutions, which practitioners can actually influence.
  • It aligns naturally with civil rights and anti-discrimination law.
  • It frames accessibility as a universal good — removing barriers often benefits everyone (curb cuts, captions on noisy platforms).
  • It empowers disabled people as agents rather than patients.

Limitations of the social model

  • It can underplay the reality of pain, fatigue, and the direct health consequences of some conditions, where medical intervention genuinely helps.
  • Applied too rigidly, it can ignore the individual’s own experience and choices regarding treatment.
  • It does not always provide practical clinical guidance for individual healthcare decisions. (BoK p. 6)

Real-world example

A public transit authority is upgrading its bus fleet. Under a medical model lens, each rider with a mobility impairment would need to document their diagnosis and request special transport. Under a social model lens, the transit authority simply installs low-floor buses with ramps — removing the barrier for everyone, without requiring anyone to prove a medical need.

Key terms

Social model
The view that disability is created by societal barriers — physical, attitudinal, and systemic — rather than by a person's impairment. (BoK p. 5)
Barrier removal
The social model's primary strategy: redesigning environments and attitudes so people with impairments can participate fully. (BoK p. 5)
Attitudinal barrier
A belief, stereotype, or prejudice held by individuals or embedded in culture that restricts participation for disabled people. (BoK p. 5)
Environmental barrier
A physical or systemic obstacle — such as a step at an entrance or a website with no captions — that prevents access. (BoK p. 6)
Human rights framework
The view, central to the social model, that participation without barriers is a right, not a privilege to be earned medically. (BoK p. 6)
Alternative formats
Content or information presented in a different medium — e.g., braille, large print, audio — to remove access barriers. (BoK p. 6)

Check yourself

Question 1 of 3

According to the social model of disability, what is the primary cause of disability?

Sources

BoK references